Comparison of two hemostasis methods after percutaneous coronary intervention
XU Yan-min
LIN Xiao-jing
LI Guang-ping
XU Gang
YIN Li
YUAN Ru-yu
ZHENG Xin-tian
CHEN Xin
摘要：Background To assess the safety and efficacy of Boomerang closure wire compared with traditional man-made compression in patients underwent coronary angiography (CAG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).Methods Three hundred and thirty-six cases who underwent transfemoral CAG or PCI were included in this study,221 cases were treated with traditional compression of hemostasis,115 cases treated with Boomerang closure wire.The hemostasia time,immobilization time and relative vascular complications of the two groups were compared.Results There were obvious difference in the hemostasia time,immobilization time and the rate of the relative vascular complications (P＜0.05),no patients experienced major complications in closure wire group,but one case experienced blood transfusion to retroperitoneal bleed in traditional man-made compression group.Conclusions closure wire is safe and effective in patients undergoing CAG or PCI using the transfemoral approach,compared with tranditional man-made compression,closure wire can extremely decrease hemostasia time and immobilization time,there is a decreased trend in relative vascular complication,especially major complication.
机标关键词：
分类号：R5(内科学)
论文发表日期：2010-04-02
在线出版日期：2025-08-15（本平台首次上网日期，不代表文献的发表时间）
英文信息